At the end of the voting process, 289 members supported the motion for state police while four voted against it, effectively clearing the proposal for further legislative progression within the constitutional amendment process.
The House of Representatives has passed for further legislative action a bill seeking the establishment of state police, following a decisive voice vote during Thursday’s plenary.
The session, presided over by Speaker Abbas Tajudeen, commenced with over 290 lawmakers in attendance.
The House Leader, Julius Ihonvbere thereafter (APC, Edo), moved a motion for the House to suspend its rules to enable consideration of a motion on the rescission of an earlier decision relating to the presentation of reports by the Committee on Constitution Review.
The motion, seconded by the Minority Leader, Fred Agbedi (PDP, Bayelsa), was adopted.
The House later proceeded to the specific item on security reform.
Mr Tajudeen explained that the House would prioritise only the security-related amendment at this stage, describing it as urgent and necessary.
He said the decision was also influenced by the need to avoid further delay, noting that members would proceed on a two-week end-of-year recess afterwards to enable proper review of remaining bills upon resumption.
Midway into proceedings, the speaker announced that the electronic voting system was not functional, compelling lawmakers to adopt a manual voice vote.
The Deputy Speaker of the House, Benjamin Kalu, who doubles as the chairman of the Constitution Review Committee, in his presentation, described the bill as a response to Nigeria’s worsening security challenges.
He said the proposed reform was designed to decentralise policing and improve response time to security incidents by allowing states to establish their own police structures.
He argued that a centralised policing system, with command structures concentrated in Abuja, had slowed response times to emergencies. According to him, state police would enable officers who are familiar with local languages, geography and communities to respond more effectively to threats.
He urged lawmakers to treat the bill as a legacy reform that would strengthen national security beyond military intervention, stressing that it reflected a broad national consensus.
The speaker later ruled that the House would not consider the bill clause by clause but by its long title. He then read out the title, after which a manual count was conducted.
At the end of the voting process, 289 members supported the motion while four voted against it, effectively clearing the proposal for further legislative progression within the constitutional amendment process.
Following the consideration, the House passed the bill, marking a major step in the constitutional amendment process on state policing.
It, thereafter, adjourned sittings until 7 July to allow members to proceed on their end-of-legislative year break and return to their constituencies.
The adjournment, according to Mr Tajudeen, is also to give lawmakers time to study the constitution amendment bills scheduled for consideration upon resumption.
With the House’s approval secured, the bill now moves to the Senate for concurrence. If approved by the upper chamber, it will be transmitted to the 36 state Houses of Assembly, where it must be endorsed by at least two-thirds of the states of the federation.
After securing state-level approval, the amendment will then be forwarded to the president for assent before it can become law.
