The Federal Government has published a list of 48 individuals and groups allegedly linked to terrorism financing in Nigeria, in a publication released by the Nigeria Sanctions Committee on Saturday that names persons and entities suspected of involvement in terrorism-related activities across multiple insurgent and separatist groups.
The list includes individuals reportedly linked to the Islamic State West Africa Province, Ansaru (Ansarul Sudan), the Boko Haram faction Jama’atu Wal-Jihad, and the Indigenous People of Biafra placing Nigeria’s Southeastern separatist movement alongside Northeast insurgent groups in the government’s terrorism financing framework.
Among the prominent names on the list is Tukur Mamu, a Kaduna-based journalist and publisher who gained national prominence as a negotiator in the 2022 Abuja-Kaduna train kidnapping before being arrested by the SSS and charged with terrorism-related offences.
The 48 designations comprise both individuals and entities.
Individuals linked to Northeast insurgency and terrorism financing (Numbers 1-23, 30-34):
Abdulsamat Ohida, Mohammed Sani, Abdurrahaman Abdurrahaman, Fatima Ishaq, Tukur Mamu, Yusuf Ghazali, Muhammad Sani, Abubakar Muhammad, Sallamudeen Hassan, Adamu Ishak, Hassana Isah, Abdulkareem Musa, Umar Abdullahi, Abdurrahaman Ado, Bashir Yusuf, Ibrahim Alhassan, Muhammad Isah, Salihu Adamu, Surajo Mohammad, Fannami Bukar, Muhammed Musa, Sahabi Ismail, Mohammed Buba, Adamu Hassan, Hassan Mohammed, Usman Abubakar, Kubara Salawu, and Rabiu Suleiman.
Entities (Numbers 24-29):
Jama’atu Wal-Jihad, Ansarul Sudan (Ansaru), Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Yan Group, and Yan Group NLBDG.
Individuals linked to IPOB and Southeast activities (Numbers 35-48):
Simon Njoku, Godstime Iyare, Francis Mmadubuchi, John Onwumere, Chikwuka Eze, Edwin Chukwuedo, Chiwendu Owoh, Ginika Orji, Awo Uchechukwu, Mercy Ali, Ohagwu Juliana, Eze Okpoto, Nwaobi Chimezie, and Ogumu Kewe.
IPOB’s Inclusion
The listing of the Indigenous People of Biafra alongside ISWAP, Ansaru, and Jama’atu Wal-Jihad as terrorism-linked entities is significant, reinforcing the Federal Government’s classification of the Southeastern separatist movement as a terrorist organisation — a designation that has remained deeply contested.
IPOB was proscribed as a terrorist organisation by the Federal High Court in September 2017 following an application by the Federal Government. The group and its supporters have consistently rejected the designation, arguing that IPOB is a peaceful self-determination movement protected by international law.
The naming of 14 individuals — from Simon Njoku to Ogumu Kewe — as persons linked to IPOB and suspected of terrorism financing represents a significant expansion of the government’s enforcement actions against the movement’s financial networks.
Tukur Mamu
The inclusion of Tukur Mamu on the list is notable. Mamu, a Kaduna-based journalist and publisher of Desert Herald newspaper, initially gained public prominence as a negotiator who helped secure the release of some of the victims of the March 2022 Abuja-Kaduna train attack, in which gunmen killed several passengers and kidnapped dozens.
He was subsequently arrested by the DSS in September 2022, accused of having links to terrorist groups and of benefiting financially from kidnapping negotiations. Mamu has denied the allegations, maintaining that his role was purely humanitarian.
His appearance on the NIGSAC sanctions list suggests the government has escalated its actions against him beyond the criminal charges to include financial sanctions and designation as a terrorism financier.
What NIGSAC Designation Means
The Nigeria Sanctions Committee operates under Nigeria’s anti-terrorism and anti-money laundering framework, working in coordination with international bodies including the United Nations Security Council sanctions committees and the Financial Action Task Force.
Designation by NIGSAC carries significant legal and financial consequences for the named individuals and entities. These typically include the freezing of all assets — bank accounts, properties, and financial instruments — held by the designated persons in Nigerian financial institutions. Financial institutions are required to report any transactions involving the designated individuals. Travel restrictions may apply. And any person or entity that provides financial support or material assistance to the designated individuals or groups may themselves face prosecution.
The Security Context
The publication of the sanctions list comes during a period of heightened security operations across multiple fronts.
In the Northeast, the military is conducting sustained operations against Boko Haram and ISWAP following a series of devastating attacks, including the Benisheikh assault that killed Brigadier General Oseni Braimah, the Maiduguri suicide bombings that killed 23 people, and the destruction of Ngoshe and Pulka in Gwoza Local Government Area.
The Federal High Court in Abuja recently concluded the ninth phase of mass terrorism trials, securing 386 convictions out of 508 cases, with sentences ranging from five years to life imprisonment.
In the Southeast, the security situation remains tense, with periodic sit-at-home orders attributed to IPOB disrupting economic activity, and ongoing operations by security forces against the group’s armed wing, the Eastern Security Network.
Financial Warfare Against Terrorism
The sanctions list represents an element of the government’s strategy that extends beyond military operations — targeting the financial networks that sustain terrorist and insurgent activities.
Security experts have long argued that disrupting terrorism financing is as critical as military operations in combating insurgency. Terrorist groups require funds for weapons procurement, recruitment, logistics, propaganda, and the sustenance of fighters and their families.
By publicly naming individuals suspected of financing these activities and subjecting them to financial sanctions, the government aims to cut off the flow of funds that enables terrorist operations.
However, the effectiveness of such designations depends heavily on enforcement — whether financial institutions actually freeze the designated persons’ assets, whether law enforcement agencies act on the designations, and whether the individuals named are ultimately prosecuted for terrorism financing offences.
Implications
The publication of the 48-name list carries several implications.
For the individuals named, the designation imposes immediate financial consequences and legal jeopardy. Those who believe they have been wrongly designated will need to challenge the listing through legal channels.
For financial institutions, the list creates compliance obligations to screen their customer databases against the designated names and freeze any identified assets.
