The ADC official accused both Messrs Tsoho and Lifu of demonstrating bias in the handling of the leadership dispute.
An official of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Nkemakolam Ukandu, has sued the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, John Tsoho, and the National Judicial Council (NJC), alleging bias, abuse of judicial powers and disobedience to court orders in connection with the reassignment of a suit challenging the party’s leadership.
He joined Judge Peter Lifu, who was recently assigned to hear the leadership dispute suit involving the party’s current leadership headed by former Senate President David Mark.
He sought, among other prayers, an order compelling the NJC to investigate the bias allegations contained in his petition against Messrs Tsoho and Lifu.
The fresh suit is the latest development in the legal battles that have trailed recent changes in the ADC’s leadership structure. The party has witnessed internal disagreements since a coalition of opposition politicians adopted it as a platform ahead of the 2027 general elections and backed a new leadership arrangement led by Mr Mark and former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola.
The changes have since sparked legal challenges from some party members, including Nafiu Bala, who contend that the process leading to the emergence of the new leadership violated the party’s constitution and established procedures.
Mr Ukandu is seeking to join Mr Bala’s suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, which challenges the legality of the current leadership arrangement within the party.
In the new suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1165/2026, Mr Ukandu challenged the decision to transfer the case from Judge Emeka Nwite to Mr Lifu.
According to court documents, the Supreme Court had on 30 April remitted the leadership dispute to Mr Nwite for the continuation of proceedings, particularly on pending applications challenging the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court to hear the matter.
Mr Ukandu stated that when the case resumed before Mr Nwite, the lawyer to the plaintiff in the leadership dispute requested that it be reassigned to another judge.
He said lawyers representing the defendants and parties seeking to be joined in the matter opposed the request.
According to him, Mr Nwite subsequently adjourned proceedings indefinitely pending service of the request on all parties, the response of the Chief Judge and the production of the certified true copy of the Supreme Court’s judgment.
The ADC official, however, alleged that despite those developments, Mr Tsoho reassigned the matter to Justice Lifu.
“Without complying with the orders of the Supreme Court and Hon. Justice Emeka Nwite, the 2nd Defendant in abuse of his judicial powers reassigned this matter,” Mr Ukandu alleged in the suit.
However, the reassignment came amid changes within the Federal High Court following the elevation of some judges, including Mr Nwite, to the Court of Appeal. The development resulted in the redistribution of a number of cases previously handled by the affected judges.
Mr Ukandu argued that notwithstanding Mr Nwite’s elevation, the Supreme Court’s directive required that the matter continue before him and that any reassignment amounted to a disregard of the apex court’s decision.
He further alleged that Mr Lifu fixed the matter for hearing despite being aware of the orders earlier made by the Supreme Court and Mr Nwite.
In the suit, the ADC official accused both Messrs Tsoho and Lifu of demonstrating bias in the handling of the leadership dispute.
He claimed that the party had, in a statement shared on 7 May, raised concerns over what it described as plans to move the case to another judge.
Mr Ukandu also alleged that no hearing notice was served on his lawyer, Kalu Agu, before proceedings were conducted on 3 June.
As part of his case, he referenced comments reportedly made by legal scholar and former chairman of Nigeria’s National Human Rights Commission, Chidi Odinkalu, regarding the assignment of political cases within the Federal High Court.
Mr Ukandu argued that those comments reinforced his fears that he would not receive a fair hearing in the leadership dispute.
He further accused Mr Lifu of disregarding judicial precedents and acting in a manner that created a perception of bias.
The allegations have not been tested in court and neither Messrs Tsoho nor Lifu has publicly responded to them.
Mr Ukandu told the court that he had already petitioned the NJC and the Chief Justice of Nigeria, alleging corruption, abuse of judicial powers, disobedience to court orders and bias against the two judges.
He is seeking a declaration affirming the responsibility of the NJC to investigate complaints against judicial officers and impose sanctions where necessary.
He also wants the court to compel the NJC to investigate the allegations contained in his petition against Messrs Tsoho and Lifu.
In addition, he is asking the court to stop Mr Lifu from further presiding over the leadership dispute pending the determination of the petition and to direct the judge to recuse himself from the matter.
As of the time of filing this report, neither the Federal High Court nor the NJC had responded to the suit.
The court has yet to fix a date for hearing in the fresh suit.
